logo - 刷刷题
下载APP
【单选题】

In many places water is becoming scarcer. Treating it as a right makes the scarcity worse. Ideally, efficient water use would be encouraged by charging for it, but attempts to do so have mostly proved politically impossible. A more practicable alternative is a system of tradable waterusage rights.
As our explains, many water problems have global causes: population growth, climate change, ization and, especially, changing diets. It takes 2,000 liters of water to grow a kilo of vegetables but 15,000 liters to produce a kilo of beef—and people are eating more meat. The problems also have global implications. Without a new green revolution, farmers will need 60% more water to feed the 2 billion extra people who will be born between now and 2025.
Yet there is, globally, no shortage of water. Unlike other natural resources (such as oil), water cannot be used up. It is recycled endlessly, as rain, snow or evaporation. On average, people are extracting for their own uses less than a tenth of what falls as rain and snow each year.
The central problem is that so much water is wasted, mainly by farmers. Agri-culture uses three-quarters of the world’s water. Because water is usually free, thirsty crops like alfalfa (苜蓿) are grown in arid California. Wheat in India and Brazil uses twice as much water as wheat in America. Dry countries like Pakistan export textiles though a 1 kg bolt of cloth requires 11,000 liters of water.
Any economist knows what to do: price water to reflect its value. But decades of trying to do that for agriculture have run into powerful resistance from farmers. They reject scarcity pricing for the reason that water falls from the skies. No government owns it, so no government should charge for it.
There is a way out. Australian farmers have the right to use a certain amount of water free. They can sell that right to others. But if they want more water themselves, they must buy it from a neighbor. The result of this trading is a market that has done what markets do: allocate resources to more productive use. Australia has endured its worst drought in modern history in the past ten years. Water supplies in some farming areas have fallen by half. Yet farmers have responded to the new market signals by switching to less thirsty crops and kept the value of farm output stable. Water productivity has doubled. Australia’s system overcomes the usual objections because it confirms farmers’ rights to water and lets them have much of it for nothing.
Which of the following is a method suggested by the author to reflect water’s value in the last paragraph

A.
People should only be entitled to certain amount of water free.
B.
People can borrow water from their neighbors when necessary.
C.
People are free to bargain for water in market in their daily lives.
D.
People have the right to trade water to raise water productivity.
举报
题目标签:苜蓿
参考答案:
参考解析:
.
刷刷题刷刷变学霸
举一反三

【单选题】In many places water is becoming scarcer. Treating it as a right makes the scarcity worse. Ideally, efficient water use would be encouraged by charging for it, but attempts to do so have mostly proved...

A.
People should only be entitled to certain amount of water free.
B.
People can borrow water from their neighbors when necessary.
C.
People are free to bargain for water in market in their daily lives.
D.
People have the right to trade water to raise water productivity.

【单选题】In many places water is becoming scarcer. Treating it as a right makes the scarcity worse. Ideally, efficient water use would be encouraged by charging for it, but attempts to do so have mostly proved...

A.
Because farmers can use water for agriculture free.
B.
Because agriculture uses 75% of the world’s water.
C.
Because most farmers are not aware of water shortage.
D.
Because too many thirsty crops are grown in dry countries.

【多选题】支持苜蓿发展政策的补助标准及方式有()。

A.
标准为600元/亩,3000亩起
B.
方式上采取先建后补,立项后,预先补助50%
C.
验收合格后,再补50%
D.
验收不合格,原预先补助不再收回也不再补发

【单选题】苜蓿萎蔫病菌长距离传播主要是通过()。

A.
灌溉水
B.
带病苜蓿种子或植物残渣
C.
收割工具
D.
土壤