logo - 刷刷题
下载APP
【简答题】

Earth Will Survive Global Warming, But Will We
The notion that human activity, or the activity of any organism, can affect Earth on a planetary scale is still a hard one for many people to swallow. And it is this kind of disbelief that fuels much of the public skepticism surrounding global warming.
A poll conducted last summer by the Pew Research Center found that only 41 percent of Americans believe the burning of fossil fuels causes global warming. But in a meeting this week in Paris, officials from 113 nations have agreed that a highly anticipated international report will state that global warming was "very likely" caused by human activity. The idea that biology can alter the planet in broad and dramatic ways is widely accepted among scientists, and they point to several precedents throughout the history of life.
The mighty microbes
Human-caused global warming--also called "anthropogenic" global warming--is the latest example of life altering Earth, but it is not the most dramatic.
That title probably goes to the oxygenation of Earth’s early atmosphere by ancient microbes as they began to harness the power of sunlight through photosynthesis(光合作用).
Humans "are having a strong effect on global geochemical cycles, but it does not compare at all to the advent of oxygenic photosynthesis," said Katrina Edwards, a geo-microbiologist at the University of Southern California (USC). "That was a catastrophic environmental change that occurred before 2.2 billion years ago which wreaked its full wrath on the Earth system."
Edwards studies another way life impacts the planet in largely unseen ways. She focuses on how microbes living on the dark ocean floor transform minerals through a kind of underwater power.
"These microbes are completely off radar in terms of global biogeochemical cycles," Edwards told Live-Science." We don’t consider them as part of the Earth system right now in our calculation about what’s going on, and we don’t consider them in terms of how the Earth system will move forward into the future."
These reactions are strongly influenced by life and have been occurring for billions of years, for as long as the oceans have been oxygenated and there have been microbes inhabiting the seafloor, Edwards said.
Creating Earth
On land, microbes, and in particular a form of bacteria called cyanobacteria (固氮蓝藻), help keep soil in place and suppress dust.
"We’d certainly have more dust storms and it would not be anywhere as nice on Earth if they weren’t around," said Jayne Belnap, a researcher with the United States Geological Survey.
Scientists believe the tiny life-forms performed the same roles on early Earth. "One of the big problems for geologists is that, OK, you have this big ball of rock, the soil is weathering out and you have these ferocious winds. What in the world is holding the soil in place as it weathers out of the rocks" Belnap said in a telephone interview. "Cyanobacteria are also credited with that function."
The microbes anchored soil to the ground; this created habitats for land plants to evolve and ually for us to evolve. "They literally created Earth in a sense," Belnap said.
"Cyanobacteria are just like ’it’," she continued. "I’ve been telling everybody to make a small altar and offer sacrifices every night. We owe them everything."
A snowball planet
The mighty microbes also triggered sudden climatic shifts similar to what humans are doing now. Recent studies suggest that the proliferation of cyanobacteria 2.3 billion years ago led to a sudden ice age and the creation of a "Snowball Earth."
As they carry out photosynthesis, cyanobacteria break apart water and release oxygen as a waste product. Oxygen is one of the most reactive elements around, and its release into the atmosphere in large amounts destroyed methane (沼气),a greenhouse gas that absorbed the sun’s energy and helped keep our planet warm.
Some scientists think the disappearance of this methane blanket plunged the planet into a cold spell so severe that Earth’s equator was covered by a mile-thick layer of ice.
Earth might still be frozen today if not for the appearance of new life forms. As organisms evolved, many developed the ability to breathe oxygen. In the process, they exhaled another greenhouse gas, Carbon dioxide, which ually ice-out the world. That was the first biologically triggered ice age, but others followed, said Richard Kopp, a Caltech researcher who helped piece together the Snowball Earth scenario.
A new leaf
When trees first appeared about 380 million years ago, they also disturbed Earth’s atmospheric balance.
Unlike animals, plants breathe in carbon dioxide and expel oxygen. Trees transform some of that atmospheric carbon into lignin (木质素)--the major constituent of wood and one of the most abundant proteins on the planet. Lignin is resistant to decay, so when a tree dies, much of its carbon becomes buried instead of released back into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. Less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere thins the blanket of gases that keeps Earth warm, and that cooling effect can trigger global cooling, possibly even an ice age.
"There was some glaciation that started around that period that was driven at least in part by the evolution of land plants," Kopp said in a telephone interview.
Trees also affected the global carbon cycle in another indirect way. As they tunnel through the ground, tree roots break down silicate rocks into sediment and soil. Silicate rock contains large amounts of calcium and magnesium (镁). When these elements are exposed to air, they react with atmospheric carbon dioxide to form calcium carbonate (碳酸盐) and magnesium carbonate, compounds that are widespread on Earth.
The human difference
Though it might seem as if humans are mere fleas along for a ride on the back of an immense animal called Earth, our intelce, technology and sheer numbers mean our species packs a punch that can shake the world in wild ways.
While we are not the first species to drastically alter our planet, our influence is unique in a number of ways, scientists say.
For one thing, humans have developed large-scale industry, said Spencer Weart, a science historian at the American Institute of Physics. "We are capable of mobilizing things beyond our own biology," Weart said. "I emit a certain amount of carbon dioxide, but my automobile emits far more."
Another is the rate at which humans are warming Earth.
"Humans are the most common large animal to ever walk the planet," said Kirk Johnson, a chief curator at the Denver Museum of Nature & Science: "Population, plus brain power and technology, is a potent combination and the result is that humans are effecting change at very high rates."
Belnap agrees. "I don’t think we’ve fundamentally changed any process. We’ve just cranked up the speed," she said. "We haven’t introduced anything new. We’ve just changed how fast or slow it happens, and mostly fast."
But no matter how high humans cause the temperature to rise and how much damage we do to the planet, Earth and life will survive, scientists say. It just might no longer be in the form we prefer or the form that allows us to thrive.
"What we need to be thinking of as humans causing changes to the Earth system is what the consequences will be to us human beings," said Edwards, the USC geo-microbiologist. "The Earth could care less. We will be recorded as a minor chaos in the Earth system. The Earth will go on. The question is: Will we\
Trees can indirectly help the exposition of calcium and magnesium with their roots ______.

举报
参考答案:
参考解析:
.
刷刷题刷刷变学霸
举一反三

【单选题】下列对于光合作用的发现过程及意义的叙述,不正确的是()

A.
梅耶根据能量转化与守恒定律明确指出,植物在进行光合作用时,把光能转换成化学能储存起来
B.
萨克斯把绿叶放置在暗处几小时,再让叶片一半曝光,另一半遮光,之后用碘蒸气处理叶片,发现曝光的一半呈深蓝色,遮光的一半没有颜色变化。证明了淀粉是光合作用的产物
C.
恩格尔曼用极细的光束照射载有水绵和好氧细菌的临时装片,发现细菌只向叶绿体被光束照射到的部位集中。证明了叶绿体能够产生氧气
D.
卡尔文用14C标记的14CO2供小球藻进行光合作用,然后追踪其放射性。发现了碳原子的转移途径为14CO2→14C3→(14CH2O)

【单选题】有关光合作用和呼吸作用说法不正确的是

A.
光合作用的场所是叶绿体,呼吸作用主要场所是线粒体
B.
光合作用只在白天进行,呼吸作用只在夜晚进行
C.
光合作用是合成有机物储存能量,呼吸作用是分解有机物释放能量
D.
合理密植和中耕松土分别是光合作用和呼吸作用原理在农业生产上的应用

【单选题】木质素纤维的纤维长度的试验方法是()。

A.
高温590~600℃燃烧后测定残留物
B.
水溶液用显微镜观测
C.
水溶液用pH试纸或pH计测定
D.
用煤油浸泡后放在筛上经振敲后称量

【单选题】Global warming will stifle life-giving microscopic plants that live in the suce layer of the oceans, cutting marine food production and accelerating climate change, according to a study published o...

A.
one percent of global economic output will be spent on it
B.
we will have to spend much more money solving the problem
C.
global economy may face great cr
D.
the ocean and the species live in it will totally disappear

【单选题】植物体进行光合作用和呼吸作用的场所分别是()

A.
叶绿体、线粒体
B.
叶绿体、液泡
C.
线粒体、叶绿体
D.
线粒体、细胞核
相关题目:
【单选题】下列对于光合作用的发现过程及意义的叙述,不正确的是()
A.
梅耶根据能量转化与守恒定律明确指出,植物在进行光合作用时,把光能转换成化学能储存起来
B.
萨克斯把绿叶放置在暗处几小时,再让叶片一半曝光,另一半遮光,之后用碘蒸气处理叶片,发现曝光的一半呈深蓝色,遮光的一半没有颜色变化。证明了淀粉是光合作用的产物
C.
恩格尔曼用极细的光束照射载有水绵和好氧细菌的临时装片,发现细菌只向叶绿体被光束照射到的部位集中。证明了叶绿体能够产生氧气
D.
卡尔文用14C标记的14CO2供小球藻进行光合作用,然后追踪其放射性。发现了碳原子的转移途径为14CO2→14C3→(14CH2O)
【单选题】有关光合作用和呼吸作用说法不正确的是
A.
光合作用的场所是叶绿体,呼吸作用主要场所是线粒体
B.
光合作用只在白天进行,呼吸作用只在夜晚进行
C.
光合作用是合成有机物储存能量,呼吸作用是分解有机物释放能量
D.
合理密植和中耕松土分别是光合作用和呼吸作用原理在农业生产上的应用
【单选题】木质素纤维的纤维长度的试验方法是()。
A.
高温590~600℃燃烧后测定残留物
B.
水溶液用显微镜观测
C.
水溶液用pH试纸或pH计测定
D.
用煤油浸泡后放在筛上经振敲后称量
【单选题】Global warming will stifle life-giving microscopic plants that live in the suce layer of the oceans, cutting marine food production and accelerating climate change, according to a study published o...
A.
one percent of global economic output will be spent on it
B.
we will have to spend much more money solving the problem
C.
global economy may face great cr
D.
the ocean and the species live in it will totally disappear
【单选题】植物体进行光合作用和呼吸作用的场所分别是()
A.
叶绿体、线粒体
B.
叶绿体、液泡
C.
线粒体、叶绿体
D.
线粒体、细胞核