logo - 刷刷题
下载APP
【单选题】

Passage Two
It was 3:45 in the morning when the vote was finally taken. After six months of arguing and final 16 hours of hot parliamentary debates, Australia’s Northern Territory became the first legal authority in the world to allow doctors to take the lives of incurably ill patients who wish to die. The measure passed by the convincing vote of 15 to 10. Almost immediately word, flashed on the Internet and was picked up, half a world away, by John Hofsess, executive director of the Right to Die Society of Canada. He sent it on via the group’s online service, Death NET. Says Hofsess: "We posted bulletins all day long, because of course this isn’t just something that happened in Australia. It’s world history."
The full import may take a while to sink in. The NT Rights of the Terminally III Law has left physicians and citizens alike trying to deal with its moral and practical implications. Some have breathed sighs of relief, others, including churches, right-to-life groups and the Australian Medical Association, bitterly attacked the bill and the haste of its passage. But the tMe is unlikely to turn back. In Australia-where an aging population, life-extending technology and changing community attitudes have all played their part-other states are going to consider a similar law to deal with euthanasia(). In the U.S. and Canada, where the right-to-die movement is gathering strength, observers are waiting for the dominoes(多米诺骨牌) to start falling.
Under the new Northern Territory law, an patient can request death probably by a deadly injection or pill-to put an end to suffering. The patient must be diagnosed as Terminally Ⅲ by two doctors. After a "cooling off" period of seven days, the patient can sign a certificate of request. After 48 hours the wish for death can be met. For Lloyd Nickson, a 54-year-old Darwin resident suffering from lung cancer, the NT Rights of Terminally III Law means he can get on with living without the haunting fear of his suffering: a terrifying death from his breathing condition. "I’m not afraid of dying from a spiritual point of view, but what I was afraid of was how I’d go, because I’ve watched people die in the hospital fighting for oxygen and clawing at their masks," he says.
Passage TwoWhen Lloyd Nickson dies, he will______

A.
face his death with calm characteristic of euthanasia
B.
experience the suffering of a lung cancer patient
C.
have an intense fear of terrible suffering
D.
undergo a cooling offperiod of seven days
题目标签:安乐死
举报
参考答案:
参考解析:
.
刷刷题刷刷变学霸
举一反三

【单选题】下面关于安乐死的表述,不正确的是

A.
安乐死的理论观点是为了节约卫生资源而提出的
B.
安乐死至今仍是医学伦理学的难题
C.
安乐死的观点是符合生命质量和生命价值原则的
D.
目前安乐死的对象只是患有不治之症而又极其痛苦的临终病人
E.
目前实施安乐死的方式有两种主动安乐死和被动安乐死

【多选题】下列能够成为支持安乐死的理由包括()

A.
安乐死是维护病人尊严的人道措施,是结束病人难以忍受的病痛的人道要求
B.
对于那些生命质量已经极低的病人,既然进行抢救也已经无力回天,就可以放弃医疗
C.
病人认为生命对于自己来说已经没有了意义,这时当然可以放弃积极的医学干预
D.
病人的生命对于他人、对于社会已经没有价值、甚至是负价值,因此实施安乐死
E.
实施安乐死是为了实现最大多少人的最大利益

【单选题】反对安乐死的下述理由中,最有可能得不到伦理支持的是( )

A.
安乐死是变相杀人,与医务人员救死扶伤的神圣职责背道而驰
B.
死生有命,个人不能自作主张
C.
医生不可杀人
D.
人有生的权利,任何时候都不能主动促死,否则有违人道
E.
不可逆病情诊断难以把握,而且由此会使患者失去自愈等机会

【单选题】安乐死的定义

A.
自然死亡
B.
他人干预死亡
C.
无痛苦死亡
D.
脑死亡
E.
自己结束生命

【单选题】反对安乐死的下述理由中,最有可能得不到伦理支持的是()。

A.
安乐死是变相杀人,与医务人员救死扶伤的神圣职责背道而驰
B.
死生有命,个人不能自作主张
C.
医生不可杀人
D.
人有生的权利,任何时候都不能主动促死,否则有违人道
E.
不可逆病情诊断难以把握,而且由此会使病人失去自愈等机会

【多选题】安乐死与安宁疗护的相同点有

A.
两者都承认医学的有限性
B.
两者都是对死亡状态的优化
C.
两者都接纳死亡
D.
两者都维护病人的尊严

【单选题】小鼠常用的安乐死法是( )

A.
颈椎脱臼处死
B.
药物致死法
C.
空气栓塞法
D.
先麻醉后失血