Whether you are writing about literature or a rock concert, there are several points about the evaluative essay you have to keep in mind. First, avoid using language that is simplistically judgmental. Don’’t say that something is great or beautiful or exciting or interesting. Your readers are apt to become defensive: "We’’ll be the judge of that," they’’ll say. Your job as the writer of this essay is to show how the work under consideration is beautiful or exciting. If you do that well, your readers will be convinced of the work’’s beauty without your saying that it’’s beautiful. An occasional, off-handed "beautiful" or "exciting" is all right; just don’’t expect your readers to be convinced unless you make them feel that beauty or excitement. Second, don’’t re-tell the story. Only a sentence or two is enough to cover the story of an entire novel. If you spend your essay telling readers what happened in The Bluest Eye, they’’ re going to wonder why they aren’’t reading Toni Morrison’’s novel instead of your essay; after all, the Nobel Prize winner probably did a better job telling her story than you could ever do. Your job is to provide some insight into how Morrison did what she did. Then, in reading your essay, readers will say, "Wow! That’’s great! I better go read that novel." There will be occasions when you are forced to use the specialized vocabulary that people who really like this kind of art are used to using. Reading the CD booklets of jazz albums is sometimes like reading a foreign language if you’’ re not hip. That’’s to be expected. If it is written well, your reader will go along with you. You can’’t be expected to review a rock concert with the same language that you’’ d use to review the performance of a string quartet (管弦四重奏). Critics who write about art sometimes have their own vocabulary for doing so, and you need to be at least somewhat familiar with that vocabulary before writing seriously about art. Which of the following statements is true according to the passage