logo - 刷刷题
下载APP
【简答题】

It was 3:45 in the morning when the vote was finally taken. After six months of arguing and final 16 hours of hot parliamentary debates, Australia’s Northern Territory became the first legal authority in the world to allow doctors to take the lives of incurably ill patients who wish to die. The measure passed by the convincing vote of 15 to 10. Almost immediately word flashed on the Internet and was picked up, half a world away, by John Hofsess, executive director of the Right to Die Society of Canada. He sent it on by way of the group’s online service, Death NET. Says Hofsess: “We posted bulletins all day long, because of course this isn’t just something that happened in Australia. It’s world history.”
The full import may take a while to sink in. The NT Rights of the Terminally Ill Law has left physicians and citizens alike trying to deal with its moral and practical implications. Some have breathed sighs of relief, others, including churches, right-to-life groups and the Australian Medical Association, bitterly attacked the bill and the hurry of its passage. But the tide is unlikely to turn back. In Australia—where an aging population, life-extending technology and changing community attitudes have all played their part—other states are going to consider a similar law to deal with euthanasia (). In the US and Canada, where the right-to-die movement is gathering strength, observers are waiting for the dominoes (多米诺骨牌) to start falling.
Under the new Northern Territory law, an patient can request death — probably by a deadly injection or pill — to put an end to suffering. The patient must be diagnosed (诊断) as Terminally Ill by two doctors. After a “cooling off” period of seven days, the patient can sign a certificate of request. After 48 hours the wish for death can be met. For Lloyd Nickson, a 54-year-old Darwin resident suffering from lung cancer, the NT Rights of Terminally Ill Law means he can get on with living without the haunting fear of his suffering: a terrifying death from his breathing condition. “I’m not afraid of dying from a spiritual point of view, but what I was afraid of was how I’d go, because I’ve watched people die in the hospital fighting for oxygen and clawing at their masks,” he says.

The word "Euthanasia" (towards the end of 2nd para) means?

It was 3:45 in the morning when the vote was finally taken. After six months of arguing and final 16 hours of hot parliamentary debates, Australia’s Northern Territory became the first legal authority in the world to allow doctors to take the lives of incurably ill patients who wish to die. The measure passed by the convincing vote of 15 to 10. Almost immediately word flashed on the Internet and was picked up, half a world away, by John Hofsess, executive director of the Right to Die Society of Canada. He sent it on by way of the group’s online service, Death NET. Says Hofsess: “We posted bulletins all day long, because of course this isn’t just something that happened in Australia. It’s world history.”
The full import may take a while to sink in. The NT Rights of the Terminally Ill Law has left physicians and citizens alike trying to deal with its moral and practical implications. Some have breathed sighs of relief, others, including churches, right-to-life groups and the Australian Medical Association, bitterly attacked the bill and the hurry of its passage. But the tide is unlikely to turn back. In Australia—where an aging population, life-extending technology and changing community attitudes have all played their part—other states are going to consider a similar law to deal with euthanasia (). In the US and Canada, where the right-to-die movement is gathering strength, observers are waiting for the dominoes (多米诺骨牌) to start falling.
Under the new Northern Territory law, an patient can request death — probably by a deadly injection or pill — to put an end to suffering. The patient must be diagnosed (诊断) as Terminally Ill by two doctors. After a “cooling off” period of seven days, the patient can sign a certificate of request. After 48 hours the wish for death can be met. For Lloyd Nickson, a 54-year-old Darwin resident suffering from lung cancer, the NT Rights of Terminally Ill Law means he can get on with living without the haunting fear of his suffering: a terrifying death from his breathing condition. “I’m not afraid of dying from a spiritual point of view, but what I was afraid of was how I’d go, because I’ve watched people die in the hospital fighting for oxygen and clawing at their masks,” he says.

The word "Euthanasia" (towards the end of 2nd para) means?

题目标签:诊断安乐死
举报
参考答案:
参考解析:
.
刷刷题刷刷变学霸
举一反三

【单选题】反对安乐死的下述理由中,最有可能得不到伦理支持的是( )

A.
安乐死是变相杀人,与医务人员救死扶伤的神圣职责背道而驰
B.
死生有命,个人不能自作主张
C.
医生不可杀人
D.
人有生的权利,任何时候都不能主动促死,否则有违人道
E.
不可逆病情诊断难以把握,而且由此会使患者失去自愈等机会

【单选题】患者女性,51岁。2年前月经开始紊乱,10~15天/2~3个月,经量大,重度贫血,常感烦躁、心悸。1年来反复发作阴道炎。诊断为围绝经期综合征。为该患者采取的护理措施中不正确的是

A.
提供心理护理,解除患者思想顾虑
B.
指导患者子宫出血停止后立即停止服用性激素
C.
指导患者摄入含钙丰富的食物
D.
向患者家属介绍女性围绝经期的相关知识
E.
鼓励患者坚持体育锻炼

【多选题】下列关于前列腺癌诊断的说法,哪项为正确的()

A.
常伴PSA增高
B.
CT、MRI对早期前列腺癌的诊断有很大价值
C.
骨转移时,X线片显示溶骨性破坏
D.
MRI可早期发现骨转移灶
E.
前列腺癌的确诊依靠经直肠针吸细胞学或B超引导下前列腺穿刺活检

【单选题】反对安乐死的下述理由中,最有可能得不到伦理支持的是()。

A.
安乐死是变相杀人,与医务人员救死扶伤的神圣职责背道而驰
B.
死生有命,个人不能自作主张
C.
医生不可杀人
D.
人有生的权利,任何时候都不能主动促死,否则有违人道
E.
不可逆病情诊断难以把握,而且由此会使病人失去自愈等机会

【多选题】安乐死与安宁疗护的相同点有

A.
两者都承认医学的有限性
B.
两者都是对死亡状态的优化
C.
两者都接纳死亡
D.
两者都维护病人的尊严